• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            S.l.e!ep.¢%

            像打了激速一樣,以四倍的速度運轉(zhuǎn),開心的工作
            簡單、開放、平等的公司文化;尊重個性、自由與個人價值;
            posts - 1098, comments - 335, trackbacks - 0, articles - 1
              C++博客 :: 首頁 :: 新隨筆 :: 聯(lián)系 :: 聚合  :: 管理

            源URL:http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2010-February/002383.html

            意思沒太懂,大概就是Z.E.R.O.M.Q主要是針對服務器間的通信,獲取客戶端連接IP的意義不大

            Hi Fred,
            
            >>> Just one question remains : were can I grab in the server
            >>> environment the IP address and portnumber of the sending client ?
            >> No way to do that at the moment, other than doing it at the app level
            >> (make up a client ID / use the IP address and stick it in the
            >> message).
            
            Let me give some background here.
            
            Simply said: 0MQ should manage connections for you. Your application 
            should be agnostic about exact location/identity of the peers. If you 
            want to work on the level of individual connections, use BSD sockets 
            rather than 0MQ.
            
            More complex answer: The issue has to do with scaling 0MQ into internet 
            scales. What you want to know is the identity of the peer who sent the 
            message. You are not interested in any middleboxes that may be on the 
            way (like zmq_forwarder etc.) Thus, getting IP address we've received 
            the message from is useless - it's IP address of the previous hop. Also, 
            if IP address is used as the identity, two applications running on the 
            same box would look exactly the same. Same application bound to several 
            network interfaces would look different depending on how exactly you are 
            connected to it. Etc.
            
            At the moment, the only thing you can do is to choose a name for your 
            application and fill it into the message. In easy to modify 0MQ to do 
            the thing for you, however, it's not a conceptual solution.
            
            Real solution still requires a lot of research work. Feel free to start 
            the discussion though.
            
            > OK, but that's (at least for me) not thrustworthy. Like SMTP telling me 
            > who they are. ;-)
            
            What you would consider trustworthy, what kind of attacks should it be 
            resistent to, etc.
            
            > You don't mind if I take a look at the sources to see whether it is 
            > doable for me ?
            
            Sure. Go for it. Any experimentation is valuable! The source is licensed 
            under LGPL so you can modify it in any way given that you publish the 
            result under LGPL.
            
            Martin
            久久久久久噜噜精品免费直播| 麻豆成人久久精品二区三区免费| 乱亲女H秽乱长久久久| 亚洲AV无一区二区三区久久| 久久九九兔免费精品6| 亚洲精品白浆高清久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久| 久久亚洲精精品中文字幕| 欧美亚洲色综久久精品国产| 久久99国产综合精品女同| 久久国产精品99精品国产987| 久久精品国产91久久麻豆自制| 久久99精品久久久久久齐齐| 午夜精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品无码久久一区二区| 99久久精品日本一区二区免费| 久久综合中文字幕| 久久久精品久久久久影院| 国产成人精品三上悠亚久久| 国产成人精品久久二区二区| 久久精品国产第一区二区| 2021国产精品午夜久久| 成人妇女免费播放久久久| 精品无码久久久久久国产| 久久久久亚洲AV成人网人人网站| 国产精品美女久久久久| 老司机午夜网站国内精品久久久久久久久 | 久久精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 亚洲国产天堂久久综合| 99国产欧美久久久精品蜜芽| 欧美久久亚洲精品| 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷综合五月| 久久精品视屏| 2021久久精品国产99国产精品 | 天天爽天天爽天天片a久久网| 久久亚洲视频| 国产精品一久久香蕉国产线看| 日韩美女18网站久久精品| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费强| 国内精品久久久久久久久电影网| 久久综合视频网站|