• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>
            posts - 297,  comments - 15,  trackbacks - 0
            Opening the same web page in multiple browser tabs or windows can cause some serious problems if that page relies on cookies or session state. If you're lucky, the problem will be obvious to the user but it's quite possible that they'll be completely unaware of it until after they've corrupted some data.
            The Problem

            Imagine the user of a web application, viewing details of Object1. The user wants to compare Object1 with Object2 so opens the details of Object2 in a second window or tab. If the application is storing the "current object id" in session state or a cookie then this value will now correspond to Object2. The user then decides to modify Object1's details, so amends them on the page and saves the changes.

            If the application is really badly coded then the save operation could update the record corresponding to the current object id (Object2) with the new details for Object1. Even if it updates the right record, the current id in session state is still wrong - if this id is used to select the data for the next page that the user visits then they will end up with both tabs/windows pointing at Object2.

            Processes

            The problem stems from the fact that multiple tabs and windows can be running in the same process.

            Firefox uses the same process for multiple tabs and, by default, the same process for all windows, whether they are launched from Windows or from each other (Ctrl-N style).

            IE6 managed it's own processes so you could never be entirely certain about when further processes would be created unless you forced the situation using the -new command line switch. The most common situation I've found is that Ctrl-N creates a window using the existing process, Javascript calls (e.g. window.open, window.show...) use the existing process, but launching IE from Windows creates a new process.

            IE7 has abandoned the -new switch, and seems to use a new process for each new window launched from Windows. All tabs within a window, however, run under one process, and spawning windows with Ctrl-N or Javascript commands seems to always re-use the existing process as well.
            Cookies and Session State

            Sharing a process isn't itself a bad thing. Time and resources can be saved by this approach, but unfortunately a browser's cookies are tied to it's process. If a page is displayed in two tabs or windows running in the same process, then the two instances of the page will share their cookies.

            There are two types of cookie. Persistent cookies are saved to disk and kept until their expiry date. Persistent cookies will always be shared between multiple instances of the same page, regardless of whether the pages are running in the same browser process. If the page creates a persistent cookie called "ObjectID" then this will be stored in a file on disk and will be accessible to any other instance of that same page (unless you use a different browser application - IE and Firefox do not share cookies).

            Session cookies, on the other hand, are kept in memory and are only available until the browser process ends. If two instances of a web application run in two separate processes then there will be two separate session cookies, but if the two instances are in the same process, then they will share the session cookie.

            Furthermore, if the web application is relying on a session cookie to store a session id (the default setup for an ASP.NET web application is to store the ASP.NET_SessionId in a session cookie) then anything in session state will be shared between the two pages: if one of them updates session state then the other will be affected.

            Options

            What this means for a developer is that it is quite possible that your application will have to cope with multiple copies of the same page running in the same process, sharing cookies. Ideally you should be able to have each page running independently of the others, regardless of them sharing a process.

            Normally you can work around the problem by using viewstate. Small objects can be stored directly in viewstate but you shouldn't be sending anything too big down the line to the browser. If your object is more than a simple integer or short string then it will probably be better to generate a GUID and store that in viewstate, using the GUID to access a part of sessionstate which can be kept unique for that instance of the page, regardless of the process-sharing.

            In the example we began with, the current object id could easily be stored in viewstate. If there was an object that needed to be persisted for some reason then it would probably be better off in session state, so the second technique would be better.

            There are times, however, when viewstate doesn't work. In some situations (for example, setting up dynamically generated controls) the current object id may be required in Page_Init, when viewstate is not available. This was actually the situation which lead to us developing an HTA-based intranet (each instance of an HTA has it's own process, so cookies and sessions are never shared), but HTA is not an option for a normal website.

            Probably the best solution, if you're using ASP.NET, is cookieless sessions. In this situation the ASP.NET session id is part of the URL, and is not shared between tabs or windows. This solution works well in the Page_Init situation, but leads to some very unwieldy URLs and has other drawbacks connected to security and absolute linking. It is also an application (or machine) setting, so cannot be used as a last resort only for those few pages that need Page_Init.

            Conclusion

            In general, viewstate is the perfect solution to the problem. Each instance of a page can keep track of its own state, with no interference from other instances.

            When state information is required in Page_Init things get a little more complicated and cookieless sessions are definitely worth considering.



            Test Code

            A simple page incrementing a counter in session state can be used to demonstrate the problem. Launching new windows with CTRL-N in either browser will default to using the existing process, as will all tabs.

            Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load

            Dim x As Integer

            If IsNothing(Session("test")) Then
            x = 1234
            Else
            x = CInt(Session("test")) + 1
            End If

            Session("test") = x

            Label1.Text = CInt(Session("test"))

            End Sub

            forwarded by as follows:
            http://www.cloudward.net/techLife/article.asp?id=1758
            posted on 2009-04-03 16:58 chatler 閱讀(805) 評論(2)  編輯 收藏 引用 所屬分類: browser

            FeedBack:
            # re: Browsers, processes, cookies and session state
            2009-04-05 15:57 | domolo

            文章說的很清楚,多謝

            我有一個問題:
            如何為每個ie instance ie實例的 Persistent cookies cookie 指定不同的存儲目錄?  回復  更多評論
              
            # re: Browsers, processes, cookies and session state
            2009-04-07 00:33 | chatler
            每個IE Instance該是不同的進程吧,可以獲取進程ID,在每個instance里建一個名稱包含進程id的目錄名,就可以分目錄存儲了吧。  回復  更多評論
              
            <2011年5月>
            24252627282930
            1234567
            891011121314
            15161718192021
            22232425262728
            2930311234

            常用鏈接

            留言簿(10)

            隨筆分類(307)

            隨筆檔案(297)

            algorithm

            Books_Free_Online

            C++

            database

            Linux

            Linux shell

            linux socket

            misce

            • cloudward
            • 感覺這個博客還是不錯,雖然做的東西和我不大相關,覺得看看還是有好處的

            network

            OSS

            • Google Android
            • Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications. This early look at the Android SDK provides the tools and APIs necessary to begin developing applications on the Android platform using the Java programming language.
            • os161 file list

            overall

            搜索

            •  

            最新評論

            閱讀排行榜

            評論排行榜

            色综合久久中文字幕综合网| 久久婷婷激情综合色综合俺也去| 国产精品久久自在自线观看| 久久久久久久综合日本亚洲| 99精品国产在热久久| 久久精品国产99国产电影网 | 97久久综合精品久久久综合| 欧美777精品久久久久网| 天堂无码久久综合东京热| 伊人久久精品无码av一区| 国产日产久久高清欧美一区| 久久久精品波多野结衣| 欧洲精品久久久av无码电影| 国产日韩久久久精品影院首页| 亚洲精品无码专区久久久| 国内精品伊人久久久久网站| 久久精品无码专区免费东京热 | 97r久久精品国产99国产精| 久久国产综合精品五月天| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久| 99久久精品国产一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久永久免费| 久久九九兔免费精品6| 国内精品免费久久影院| 久久99免费视频| 日产精品久久久一区二区| 亚洲美日韩Av中文字幕无码久久久妻妇 | 久久精品国产精品亚洲精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久中文字幕 | 99久久精品费精品国产一区二区| 精品综合久久久久久97| 日韩精品久久久久久久电影| 久久se精品一区二区影院 | 91久久精品91久久性色| 精产国品久久一二三产区区别| 四虎影视久久久免费| 久久综合久久鬼色| 精品久久久久久国产| 亚洲欧美伊人久久综合一区二区 | 91麻豆国产精品91久久久| 久久久久久A亚洲欧洲AV冫 |