• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            牽著老婆滿街逛

            嚴以律己,寬以待人. 三思而后行.
            GMail/GTalk: yanglinbo#google.com;
            MSN/Email: tx7do#yahoo.com.cn;
            QQ: 3 0 3 3 9 6 9 2 0 .

            C# versus C++ versus Java performance comparison

            轉載自:http://www.proxyfreesurfing.info/browse.php?u=Oi8vZXJpcmVmcm95bnFyLm95YnRmY2JnLnBiei8yMDA5LzAyL3AtaXJlZmhmLXAtaXJlZmhmLXduaW4tY3Jlc2Jlem5hcHIudWd6eQ%3D%3D&b=5&f=norefer

            The performance comparison of C#, Java and C++ was always a controversial subject. Many people who are unfamiliar with JIT'ed environments claimed anything runs on JIT is too slow compared to C++. On the other hand people who actually use Java and C# usually claimed the otherwise that performance impact is negligable. Here's a nice chart I've found that a friend in freenode IRC server pointed me. These benchmarks are done by Matt R Warren (aka Moridin8 in irc.freenode.net) and his original site is http://www.csharp-architect.com


            According to below chart, choosing C++ just for the sake of performance doesn't seem very feasable to me. Remember : Engineers are expensive and servers are not!




            posted on 2011-07-13 14:19 楊粼波 閱讀(868) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用

            成人免费网站久久久| 精品综合久久久久久97| 久久人人爽人人人人爽AV| 久久99精品久久久久久齐齐| 国产精品无码久久综合| 亚洲国产另类久久久精品小说| 午夜精品久久久久久| 国产成人精品久久亚洲| 99久久精品免费看国产一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美亚洲综合久久影院Ds | www.久久热.com| 韩国无遮挡三级久久| 狠狠干狠狠久久| 伊人久久大香线蕉精品| 国産精品久久久久久久| 一本色道久久88综合日韩精品| 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品字幕久久久| 久久夜色精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品久久久久久久久久影院| 久久久久国产精品嫩草影院| 亚洲国产精品无码久久一线 | 色诱久久av| 无码国内精品久久人妻| 久久久青草久久久青草| 久久午夜综合久久| 性欧美丰满熟妇XXXX性久久久| 久久青青草原精品影院| 亚洲Av无码国产情品久久| 亚洲午夜久久久久妓女影院| 久久国产精品99久久久久久老狼| 精品久久久久久无码人妻热| 久久精品人人做人人爽电影| 久久精品国产91久久麻豆自制| 久久久久久极精品久久久 | 国产精品国色综合久久| 久久精品国产亚洲精品| 久久亚洲中文字幕精品有坂深雪 | 久久精品人人做人人爽电影| 青草影院天堂男人久久| 精品国产乱码久久久久软件| 国产激情久久久久影院老熟女免费|