• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            牽著老婆滿街逛

            嚴以律己,寬以待人. 三思而后行.
            GMail/GTalk: yanglinbo#google.com;
            MSN/Email: tx7do#yahoo.com.cn;
            QQ: 3 0 3 3 9 6 9 2 0 .

            C# versus C++ versus Java performance comparison

            轉載自:http://www.proxyfreesurfing.info/browse.php?u=Oi8vZXJpcmVmcm95bnFyLm95YnRmY2JnLnBiei8yMDA5LzAyL3AtaXJlZmhmLXAtaXJlZmhmLXduaW4tY3Jlc2Jlem5hcHIudWd6eQ%3D%3D&b=5&f=norefer

            The performance comparison of C#, Java and C++ was always a controversial subject. Many people who are unfamiliar with JIT'ed environments claimed anything runs on JIT is too slow compared to C++. On the other hand people who actually use Java and C# usually claimed the otherwise that performance impact is negligable. Here's a nice chart I've found that a friend in freenode IRC server pointed me. These benchmarks are done by Matt R Warren (aka Moridin8 in irc.freenode.net) and his original site is http://www.csharp-architect.com


            According to below chart, choosing C++ just for the sake of performance doesn't seem very feasable to me. Remember : Engineers are expensive and servers are not!




            posted on 2011-07-13 14:19 楊粼波 閱讀(868) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用

            久久久久久久97| 精品熟女少妇av免费久久| 狠狠综合久久综合中文88| 亚洲国产日韩欧美久久| 亚洲午夜久久久久妓女影院| 99久久无码一区人妻a黑| 品成人欧美大片久久国产欧美...| 武侠古典久久婷婷狼人伊人| 狠狠综合久久AV一区二区三区| 久久99国产精品一区二区| 久久最新免费视频| 久久精品99久久香蕉国产色戒 | 人妻无码久久精品| 欧美精品久久久久久久自慰| 91精品国产91久久久久久蜜臀| 亚洲伊人久久成综合人影院| 久久精品国产精品青草| 国内精品伊人久久久久777| 久久久久无码精品| …久久精品99久久香蕉国产| 久久精品国产AV一区二区三区 | 青春久久| 久久97精品久久久久久久不卡| 99久久国产宗和精品1上映| 九九热久久免费视频| 色成年激情久久综合| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码偷窥| 久久久亚洲AV波多野结衣| 久久久久人妻一区精品| 久久精品亚洲欧美日韩久久| 亚洲狠狠综合久久| 国产精品美女久久久久av爽| 亚洲国产精品久久久久婷婷软件| 精品久久久久久久无码| 国内精品久久久久久99蜜桃| 久久99精品久久久久子伦| 亚洲成色WWW久久网站| 嫩草伊人久久精品少妇AV| 少妇久久久久久被弄高潮| 久久婷婷国产综合精品| 久久国产精品无码HDAV|