• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            Throwing a football, Part II

            https://www.wired.com/2008/12/throwing-a-football-part-ii/

            IN PART I of this post, I talked about the basics of projectile motion with no air resistance. Also in that post, I showed that (without air resistance) the angle to throw a ball for maximum range is 45 degrees. When throwing a football, there is some air resistance this means that 45 degree is not necessarily the angle for the greatest range. Well, can’t I just do the same thing as before? It turns out that it is a significantly different problem when air resistance is added. Without air resistance, the acceleration was constant. Not so now, my friend.

            The problem is that air resistance depends on the velocity of the object. Search your feelings, you know this to be true. When you are driving (or riding) in a car and you stick your hand out the window, you can feel the air pushing against your hand. The faster the car moves, the greater this force. The air resistance force depends on:

            • Velocity of the object. The typical model used for objects like a football would depend on the direction and the square of the magnitude of the velocity.
            • The density of air.
            • The cross sectional area of the object. Compare putting an open hand out the car window to a closed fist out the car window.
            • Some air drag coefficient. Imagine a cone and a flat disk, both with the same radius (and thus same cross sectional area). These two objects would have different air resistances due to the shape, this is the coefficient of drag (also called other things I am sure).

            So, since the air force depends on the velocity, it will not be a constant acceleration. Kinematic equations won’t really work. To easily solve this problem, I will use numerical methods. The basic idea in numerical calculations is to break the problem into a whole bunch of little steps. During these small steps, the velocity does not change much so that I can “pretend” like the acceleration is constant. Here is a diagram of the forces on the ball while in the air.

            air-resistance-diagram-1

            Before I go any further, I would like to say that there has been some “stuff” done on throwing a football before – and they probably do a better job than this post. Here are a few references (especially with more detailed discussion about the coefficient of drag for a spinning football):

            And now for some assumptions:

            • I hereby assume that the air resistance is proportional to the square of the magnitude of the velocity of the object.
            • The orientation of the football is such that the coefficient of drag is constant. This may not actually be true. Imagine if the ball were thrown and spinning with the axis parallel to the ground. If the axis stayed parallel to the ground, for part of the motion the direction of motion would not be along the axis. Get it?
            • Ignore aerodynamic lift effects.
            • Mass of the ball is .42 kg.
            • The density of air is 1.2 kg/m3.
            • The coefficient of drag for the football is 0.05 to 0.14
            • Typical initial speed of a thrown football is around 20 m/s.

            And finally, here is the recipie for my numerical calculation (in vpython of course):

            • Set up initial conditions
            • Set the angle of the throw
            • Calculate the new position assuming a constant velocity.
            • Calculate the new momentum (and thus velocity) assuming a constant force.
            • Calculate the force (it changes when the velocity changes)
            • Increase the time.
            • Keep doing the above until the ball gets back to y=0 m.
            • Change the angle and do all the above again.

            The answer

            First, I ran the program with an initial velocity of 20 m/s. Here is the data:

            rangeplot2

            At 35 degrees, this gives a distance of 23 meters (25 yards). This doesn’t seem right. I know a quarterback can throw farther than that. What if I change the coefficient to 0.05? Then the greatest angle is closer to 40 degrees and it goes 28 meters. Still seems low (think Doug Flutie). What about with no air resistance? Then it goes 41 meters (at 45 degrees). So, here is the Doug Flutie throw.

            From the video, it looks like he threw the ball from the 36ish yard line to about the 2 yard line. This would be 62 yards (56.7 meters). I am going to assume a coefficient of 0.07 (randomly). So, what initial speed will get this far? If I put in an initial velocity of 33 m/s, the ball will go 55.7 meters at an angle of 35 degrees.

            Really the thing that amazes me is that someone (not me) can throw a ball that far and essentially get it where they want it. Even if they are only sometimes successful, it is still amazing. How is it that humans can throw things somewhat accurately? We obviously do not do projectile motion calculations in our head – or maybe we do?

            Go Back to Top. Skip To: Start of Article.

            posted on 2017-09-24 13:32 zmj 閱讀(649) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用

            国内精品久久九九国产精品| 国产精品成人精品久久久| 国产成人久久精品一区二区三区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片av麻烦| 亚洲国产精品无码成人片久久| 91久久精品91久久性色| 香蕉99久久国产综合精品宅男自| 久久99国产综合精品| 国产精品青草久久久久福利99 | 亚洲伊人久久综合影院| 亚洲精品无码久久久影院相关影片| 久久99精品国产| 99精品国产免费久久久久久下载| 色诱久久久久综合网ywww | 亚洲国产精品久久电影欧美| 97久久香蕉国产线看观看| 国产精品乱码久久久久久软件 | 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 久久综合日本熟妇| 国产亚州精品女人久久久久久| 蜜臀av性久久久久蜜臀aⅴ| 亚洲伊人久久成综合人影院 | 久久亚洲精品国产精品婷婷| 国产激情久久久久影院老熟女| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码二区 | 国产午夜精品久久久久九九| 国产精品免费看久久久| 久久成人国产精品免费软件| 精品久久人人爽天天玩人人妻| 91精品国产91久久综合| 久久精品中文无码资源站 | 久久免费线看线看| 丰满少妇人妻久久久久久| 热re99久久6国产精品免费| 久久精品人人做人人爽电影| 久久久久久免费视频| 久久久久亚洲AV无码观看| 久久久久久国产精品美女| 久久精品中文字幕一区| 色综合久久中文字幕无码| 蜜臀av性久久久久蜜臀aⅴ麻豆|