• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            風(fēng)雨

            驀然回首 卻在燈火闌珊處
            posts - 3, comments - 2, trackbacks - 0, articles - 0
              C++博客 :: 首頁(yè) :: 新隨筆 :: 聯(lián)系 :: 聚合  :: 管理

            Computing n choose k mod p

            Postby joshi13 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:49 am

            Hi all.

            How can we apply the modular multiplicative inverse when calculating

            (n choose k) mod p, where 'p' is a prime number.

            If you could suggest some related problems, it would be very helpful.

            Thanks in advance.


            Re: Computing n choose k mod p

            Postby mf » Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:56 am

            You could use .


            Re: Computing n choose k mod p

            Postby maxdiver » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:03 pm

            There is another, more "mechanical", but more general, approach. It can be applied to any formula containing factorials over some modulo.

            C_n^k = n! / (k! (n-k)!)
            Let's learn how to compute n! mod p, but factorial without factors p and so on:
            n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * _1_ * (p+1) * (p+2) * ... * (2p-1) * _2_ * (2p+1) * (2p+2) * ... * n.
            We took the usual factorial, but excluded all factors of p (1 instead of p, 2 instead of 2p, and so on).
            I name this 'strange factorial'.

            If n is not very large, we can calculate this simply, then GOTO END_SCARY_MATHS :)
            If p is not large, then GOTO BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:
            Else - skip the rest of the post :)

            BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:
            After taking each factor mod p, we get:
            n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 2 * 1 * 2 * ... * n.
            So 'strange factorial' is really several blocks of construction:
            1 * 2 * 3 * ... * (p-1) * i
            where i is a 1-indexed index of block taken again without factors p ('strange index' :) ).
            The last block could be not full. More precisely, there will be floor(n/p) full blocks and some tail (its result we can compute easily, in O(P)).
            The result in each block is multiplication 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1), which is common to all blocks, and multiplication of all 'strange indices' i from 1 to floor(n/p).
            But multiplication of all 'strange indices' is really a 'strange factorial' again, so we can compute it recursively. Note, that in recursive calls n reduces exponentially, so this is rather fast algorithm.

            So... After so much brainfucking maths I must give a code :)
            Code: Select all
            int factmod (int n, int p) {
               long long res = 1;
               while (n > 1) {
                  long long cur = 1;
                  for (int i=2; i<p; ++i)
                     cur = (cur * i) % p;
                  res = (res * powmod (cur, n/p, p)) % p;
                  for (int i=2; i<=n%p; ++i)
                     res = (res * i) % p;
                  n /= p;
               }
               return int (res % p);
            }

            Asymptotic... There are log_p n iterations of while, inside it there O(p) multiplications, and calculation of power, that can be done in O(log n). So asymptotic is O ((log_p n) (p + log n)).
            Unfortunately I didn't check the code on any online judge, but the idea (which was explained by Andrew Stankevich) is surely right.
            END_SCARY_MATHS:

            So, we can now compute this 'strange factorial' modulo p. Because p is prime, and we've excluded all multiples of p, then the result would be different from zero. This means we can compute inverse for them, and compute C_n^k = n!* / (k!* (n-k)!*) (mod p).
            But, of course, before all this, we should check, if p was in the same power in the nominator and denominator of the fraction. If it was indeed in the same power, then we can divide by it, and we get exactly these 'strange factorials'. If the power of p in nominator was greater, then the result will obviously be 0. The last case, when power in denominator is greater than in nominator, is obviously incorrect (the fraction won't be integer).

            P.S. How to compute power of prime p in n! ? Easy formula: n/p + n/(p^2) + n/(p^3) + ...


            (轉(zhuǎn)載:http://acm.uva.es/board/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=42690&sid=25bd8f7f17abec626f2ee065fec3703b

            只有注冊(cè)用戶登錄后才能發(fā)表評(píng)論。
            網(wǎng)站導(dǎo)航: 博客園   IT新聞   BlogJava   博問(wèn)   Chat2DB   管理


            久久综合久久自在自线精品自| 国产成人精品久久免费动漫 | 69国产成人综合久久精品| 人妻无码久久一区二区三区免费| 久久精品亚洲一区二区三区浴池| 国产∨亚洲V天堂无码久久久 | 亚洲Av无码国产情品久久| 久久伊人精品一区二区三区| 无码AV中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲国产二区三区久久| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜不卡| 亚洲欧美精品伊人久久| 亚洲午夜无码久久久久| 久久精品国产一区二区| 日韩亚洲欧美久久久www综合网| 国产69精品久久久久久人妻精品| 国产成人无码精品久久久免费| 国产成人精品久久综合| 国产精品伦理久久久久久| 久久99久国产麻精品66| 99久久婷婷免费国产综合精品| 久久99精品国产麻豆不卡| 欧美精品久久久久久久自慰| 久久综合狠狠综合久久97色| 国产精品综合久久第一页| 国产精品禁18久久久夂久| 东方aⅴ免费观看久久av| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区网站| 久久91精品国产91久久户| 亚洲欧美日韩中文久久| 国产免费久久精品99re丫y| 久久久99精品成人片中文字幕| 91精品国产综合久久四虎久久无码一级 | 9久久9久久精品| 亚洲午夜福利精品久久| 91精品国产91久久久久久青草 | 久久精品国产亚洲AV麻豆网站| 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久app| 成人综合久久精品色婷婷| 久久只这里是精品66| 久久精品国产99久久久古代|