• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            風雨

            驀然回首 卻在燈火闌珊處
            posts - 3, comments - 2, trackbacks - 0, articles - 0
              C++博客 :: 首頁 :: 新隨筆 :: 聯系 :: 聚合  :: 管理

            [轉載] Computing n choose k mod p

            Posted on 2010-05-04 10:07 zgm 閱讀(549) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用

            Computing n choose k mod p

            Postby joshi13 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:49 am

            Hi all.

            How can we apply the modular multiplicative inverse when calculating

            (n choose k) mod p, where 'p' is a prime number.

            If you could suggest some related problems, it would be very helpful.

            Thanks in advance.


            Re: Computing n choose k mod p

            Postby mf » Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:56 am

            You could use .


            Re: Computing n choose k mod p

            Postby maxdiver » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:03 pm

            There is another, more "mechanical", but more general, approach. It can be applied to any formula containing factorials over some modulo.

            C_n^k = n! / (k! (n-k)!)
            Let's learn how to compute n! mod p, but factorial without factors p and so on:
            n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * _1_ * (p+1) * (p+2) * ... * (2p-1) * _2_ * (2p+1) * (2p+2) * ... * n.
            We took the usual factorial, but excluded all factors of p (1 instead of p, 2 instead of 2p, and so on).
            I name this 'strange factorial'.

            If n is not very large, we can calculate this simply, then GOTO END_SCARY_MATHS :)
            If p is not large, then GOTO BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:
            Else - skip the rest of the post :)

            BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:
            After taking each factor mod p, we get:
            n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 2 * 1 * 2 * ... * n.
            So 'strange factorial' is really several blocks of construction:
            1 * 2 * 3 * ... * (p-1) * i
            where i is a 1-indexed index of block taken again without factors p ('strange index' :) ).
            The last block could be not full. More precisely, there will be floor(n/p) full blocks and some tail (its result we can compute easily, in O(P)).
            The result in each block is multiplication 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1), which is common to all blocks, and multiplication of all 'strange indices' i from 1 to floor(n/p).
            But multiplication of all 'strange indices' is really a 'strange factorial' again, so we can compute it recursively. Note, that in recursive calls n reduces exponentially, so this is rather fast algorithm.

            So... After so much brainfucking maths I must give a code :)
            Code: Select all
            int factmod (int n, int p) {
               long long res = 1;
               while (n > 1) {
                  long long cur = 1;
                  for (int i=2; i<p; ++i)
                     cur = (cur * i) % p;
                  res = (res * powmod (cur, n/p, p)) % p;
                  for (int i=2; i<=n%p; ++i)
                     res = (res * i) % p;
                  n /= p;
               }
               return int (res % p);
            }

            Asymptotic... There are log_p n iterations of while, inside it there O(p) multiplications, and calculation of power, that can be done in O(log n). So asymptotic is O ((log_p n) (p + log n)).
            Unfortunately I didn't check the code on any online judge, but the idea (which was explained by Andrew Stankevich) is surely right.
            END_SCARY_MATHS:

            So, we can now compute this 'strange factorial' modulo p. Because p is prime, and we've excluded all multiples of p, then the result would be different from zero. This means we can compute inverse for them, and compute C_n^k = n!* / (k!* (n-k)!*) (mod p).
            But, of course, before all this, we should check, if p was in the same power in the nominator and denominator of the fraction. If it was indeed in the same power, then we can divide by it, and we get exactly these 'strange factorials'. If the power of p in nominator was greater, then the result will obviously be 0. The last case, when power in denominator is greater than in nominator, is obviously incorrect (the fraction won't be integer).

            P.S. How to compute power of prime p in n! ? Easy formula: n/p + n/(p^2) + n/(p^3) + ...


            (轉載:http://acm.uva.es/board/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=42690&sid=25bd8f7f17abec626f2ee065fec3703b
            精品伊人久久久| 亚洲国产精品无码久久SM| 国产精品嫩草影院久久| 久久国产影院| 日日躁夜夜躁狠狠久久AV| 18岁日韩内射颜射午夜久久成人 | 久久久久亚洲av无码专区喷水| 国产亚洲精品久久久久秋霞 | 久久国产成人精品国产成人亚洲| 久久无码人妻精品一区二区三区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久蜜芽| 久久久久久狠狠丁香| 99久久做夜夜爱天天做精品| 亚洲国产精品久久| 噜噜噜色噜噜噜久久| 四虎国产精品免费久久久| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久秋霞2 | 97久久国产综合精品女不卡| 婷婷久久综合九色综合98| 中文字幕精品无码久久久久久3D日动漫 | 久久国产精品一区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人AV东京热 | 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久app| 久久久久久午夜成人影院| 少妇久久久久久被弄到高潮 | 久久综合九色综合97_久久久| 国产69精品久久久久久人妻精品| 久久精品国产欧美日韩| 久久久国产精品福利免费| 久久久老熟女一区二区三区| 免费精品久久天干天干| 久久无码中文字幕东京热| 久久久久久一区国产精品| 7国产欧美日韩综合天堂中文久久久久| 精品久久久久久久无码| 日本久久久久亚洲中字幕| 午夜天堂av天堂久久久| 久久亚洲精品国产精品| 久久国产色AV免费看| 久久99热狠狠色精品一区| 日韩精品久久久久久|