• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>
            Creative Commons License
            本Blog采用 知識共享署名-非商業(yè)性使用-禁止演繹 3.0 Unported許可協(xié)議 進行許可。 —— Fox <游戲人生>

            游戲人生

            游戲人生 != ( 人生 == 游戲 )
            站點遷移至:http://www.yulefox.com。請訂閱本博的朋友將RSS修改為http://feeds.feedburner.com/yulefox
            posts - 62, comments - 508, trackbacks - 0, articles - 7

            Autotools初體驗

            Posted on 2009-12-23 02:18 Fox 閱讀(6921) 評論(5)  編輯 收藏 引用 所屬分類: T技術(shù)碎語

            本文同步自游戲人生

            Writen by Fox(yulefox.at.gmail.com)


            從接觸和使用make以來,前前后后寫了不少Makefile(添添減減、修修補補,累計上千行是有的),今天在重新整理代碼的組織結(jié)構(gòu)之后,突然就想:我為什么不使用Autotools呢?

            在開始體驗功能強大的Autotools之前,簡單(詳細)回憶總結(jié)一下我使用make的經(jīng)歷和思考的過程,反省一下看看自己在接觸這些新鮮事物的時候到底走了多少彎路。

            o Cygwin

            今年3月份,拜Kevin Lynx所賜,每次對Linu淺嘗輒止的我終于下決心接觸了Cygwin環(huán)境,并一發(fā)不可收拾。

            剛開始的時候,就像大學剛接觸編程那樣,寫“hello, world”,在終端用gcc命令直接編譯,然后開始寫最簡單的只有一個all的Makefile。因為Emacs、GCC、make對我來說都是嶄新的 工具,后面重心就不是放在寫代碼上了,而是急于掌握他們,以求達到在Windows下的開發(fā)效率。

            去年11月底,當時還沒有開始用Cygwin,就買了一本《Managing Projects with GNU Make》,此時也算物盡其用了。慢慢開始使用variables、macros、phony targets、functions,按步就班的系統(tǒng)學習應用。

            o Ubuntu

            磨磨蹭蹭過了半年,其間因為忙著畢業(yè),對Cygwin和Emacs、GCC、make也算比較熟悉了。

            今年10月份,開始使用Ubuntu,剛開始在Windows下用wubi安裝,很快就直接用新的硬盤分區(qū)物理安裝,并隨著Ubuntu 9.10的發(fā)布,升級到了9.10

            這前后寫Makefile最大的區(qū)別就是,之前純粹是為了寫而寫,之后是為了用而寫。

            隨著整個代碼結(jié)構(gòu)的不斷膨脹和修改,Makefile也不斷的變化。

            Makefile自身的最大變化是從之前的因為編寫錯誤、通用性差而不斷修改,演變到最后代碼增減不會影響Makefile,只是為了增加tags、優(yōu)化結(jié)構(gòu)而改動。

            經(jīng)歷了這個過程后,對于Makefile的結(jié)構(gòu)就比較熟悉了,而且可以從其他使用automake的項目的Makefile中學習借鑒了。


            之所以想到使用autotools,是因為接觸的很多開源項目的代碼都使用了這一組工具。

            對于用戶而言,一般的項目編譯安裝的過程:

            o bootstrap:檢測autoconfautomakelibtool及其版本并完成初始化,生成configure;

            o configure:檢測系統(tǒng)平臺及軟硬件環(huán)境,確定適用本地環(huán)境的編譯策略,生成Makefiles;

            o make:編譯、鏈接;

            o make install:安裝;

            o ldconfig:配置環(huán)境變量。

            對于開發(fā)者而言,則需要通過autoconf、automake為用戶組織起上面的過程:

            Autoconf 流程
            Autoconf 流程

            對于這一流程,我的方法是照葫蘆畫瓢,參考OGRE等項目的相關(guān)文件和工具的GNU文檔。

            寫個Hello, Kitty。

            操作的流程和期間出現(xiàn)的幾個問題總結(jié)一下:

            o cd project_dir:轉(zhuǎn)到項目目錄;

            o emacs Hello.cpp

            #include <iostream>

            int main(int argc, char** argv)
            {
            std::cout << "Hello, Kitty!" << std::endl;
            return 0;
            }

            o autoscan:生成configure.scan

            #                                               -*- Autoconf -*-
            # Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.

            AC_PREREQ([2.64])
            AC_INIT([FULL-PACKAGE-NAME], [VERSION], [BUG-REPORT-ADDRESS])
            AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([Hello.cpp])
            AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])

            # Checks for programs.
            AC_PROG_CXX

            # Checks for libraries.

            # Checks for header files.

            # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics.

            # Checks for library functions.

            AC_OUTPUT

            o mv configure.scan configure.in:改名;

            O emacs configure.in:編輯configure.in

            AC_PREREQ([2.64])

            # 這個是自動生成的,因為代碼中沒有相關(guān)初始化信息,這里手動修改一下,非必要
            AC_INIT([CgFox], [0.0.1], [http://www.yulefox.com])

            # 這個是必須的,否則無法生成aclocal.m4
            AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([CgFox], 0.0.1)

            AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([Hello.cpp])

            o aclocal:生成aclocal.m4(太長了,還沒去仔細了解)和autom4te.cache;

            o autoconf:生成configure(也很長,先不看);

            o automake --add-missing。

            ……


            本來想等明天(今天)弄完了再詳細整理一下。不過我沒有打算把這個東西搞成一篇教程。記下來更多的只是為了給自己留下一個lable,知道自己這幾天在做什么。

            最近又是兩點左右睡。腦子里有個家伙告訴我這樣不好;另一個家伙告訴我他還不困;還一個家伙告訴我明天還要上班。

            我去你大爺?shù)模?/p>

            Feedback

            # re: Autotools初體驗[未登錄]  回復  更多評論   

            2009-12-23 08:15 by jacky
            autotools用起來太繁瑣,OGRE已經(jīng)用cmake來構(gòu)建了,很好用。

            # re: Autotools初體驗  回復  更多評論   

            2009-12-23 09:04 by Fox
            In practice, CMake not only lacks a rich platform tests suite, compared to autoconf, it also lacks a lot of features from automake and libtool.

            So why should you not switch an autotools-based project over to CMake?

            Tedious
            First and foremost, your configure.ac script may be large. Porting to CMake can be a time consuming and not so funnny task when it comes to the long tail.
            iconv support missing
            There are no standard tests for iconv(), neither for finding the compiler flags, nor whether it takes a const pointer.
            pkg-config support broken
            pkg-config support is reportedly broken as of cmake 2.4 patch 8.
            Exported symbols list not implemented
            There are no documented ways to specify the list of exported symbols for a shared libraries, so your libraries will unconditionnaly expose all their non-static APIs (libtool can use a flat list or a regular expression).
            C99 compiler check missing
            There is no built-in support to enable C99 support in the C compiler.
            Objective-C flags not supported
            You can add flags for the Objective-C compiler, but they propagate to C compilation as well.
            Compiler feature checks missing
            There are no built-in checks for any of the C99 features, such as variable-sized arrays, restricted pointers, macros with variable number of arguments, etc. nor for GCCisms.
            Monolithic installation prefix
            There is only one global installation prefix. So the typical Linux distro cannot set the global prefix to /usr while the system configuration (automake's sysconfdir) would be /etc. Very nice for "downstream" Linux packagers...
            Installation paths hard-coding
            As a consequence of the single prefix, you need to hard-code all paths from the prefix. Instead of ${docdir}, you need to hard-code ${prefix}/share/doc/${package} (${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/share/doc/foobar in CMake parliance) and so on and so forth. BSD porters are going to have fun tweaking the paths manually...
            Uninstallation not supported
            There is sipport for uninstalling. That is a design choice. You'd better never ever try to install a package straight from the build tree, without a proper packaging system.
            Installation testsuite not supported
            Since there is no uninstallation, there is no of course no distcheck target either. How often did you get your source tarball right from the first attempt before a new release?
            No cross-compilation
            There is no documented support for cross-compilation. This is scheduled for a future release.
            Limited documentation
            Compared to autotools, the documentation feels a bit light. At least, there is a wiki, but that cannot replace a good offline reference.
            Limited executable renaming
            CMake is not quite as powerful as automake (with program-prefix, program-suffix and program-transform-name) when it comes to on-the-fly executable renaming. This little-known feature of automake can be extremely useful when building an operating system distribution with possibly conflicting executable names from different projects. For instance, it is very conveniant along with the Debian alternatives system.
            No source tarball packaging
            There is no built-in support for making a tarball (make dist). Some Version Control Systems can do it themselves (git does, Subversion does not). This is quite critical a feature for open-source projects.
            No source tarball testing
            As there is no replacement for make dist, there is no replacement for make distcheck either. From my not-so-humble experience, that is tremendously useful before doing a new release. (NOTE: when I write distcheck, I mean distcheck. I don't mean check which becomes test with CMake)
            No gettext integration
            Gettext is not supported. Targets for .po and .mo files must be added manually. Nevermind that this is the most widely used localization subsystem in the open-source community.
            Awkward feature listing
            Whereby ./configure --help gives the list of build option, cmake --help prints the CMake options only. Instead, it seems you have to run cmake in "interactive" mode and answer a question for each and every setting (much like Linux kernel make config).
            ---------------------------
            當然這些問題對于我不是必需的,不過還是等我autotools用一段時間再說:)

            # re: Autotools初體驗  回復  更多評論   

            2009-12-24 10:31 by 飯中淹
            這個相對于IDE來說,有什么優(yōu)勢?

            # re: Autotools初體驗  回復  更多評論   

            2009-12-24 10:52 by Fox
            @飯中淹
            這套工具現(xiàn)在對于我更多的是一個學習和試驗,如果希望和別人交流和共同開發(fā)跨平臺(尤其是non-win)的代碼的話,由于需要對依賴庫進行檢測,這個工作可以由autoconf+automake來完成。
            亚洲精品午夜国产VA久久成人| 久久五月精品中文字幕| 久久精品人人做人人爽电影蜜月| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕一区二区 | 国内精品久久久久久野外| 丁香五月网久久综合| 久久乐国产精品亚洲综合| 亚洲色欲久久久综合网东京热| 精品一区二区久久| 97精品依人久久久大香线蕉97| 亚洲欧美精品伊人久久| 久久精品国产日本波多野结衣| 久久ww精品w免费人成| 伊人久久大香线蕉AV一区二区| 99精品国产在热久久无毒不卡 | 要久久爱在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久福利| 亚洲精品久久久www| 国产精品久久久久影院色| 久久久久99这里有精品10| 99久久精品九九亚洲精品| 久久精品人人做人人爽97| 久久强奷乱码老熟女网站| 精品人妻伦九区久久AAA片69| 色综合久久久久无码专区| 久久精品国产99国产精品亚洲 | 久久99热这里只有精品国产| 久久国产乱子伦免费精品| 亚洲色大成网站www久久九 | 久久无码一区二区三区少妇| 久久精品中文字幕久久| 大伊人青草狠狠久久| 69久久夜色精品国产69| 久久久一本精品99久久精品66| 99久久做夜夜爱天天做精品| 久久性精品| 亚洲国产天堂久久综合| 一本大道久久香蕉成人网| 国产精品久久久久久久人人看| 麻豆久久久9性大片| 一本一本久久a久久综合精品蜜桃|