• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            C++&&Linux

            做自己喜歡的事情

              C++博客 :: 首頁 :: 聯系 :: 聚合  :: 管理
              3 Posts :: 4 Stories :: 1 Comments :: 0 Trackbacks

            常用鏈接

            留言簿(18)

            我參與的團隊

            搜索

            •  

            最新評論

            閱讀排行榜

            評論排行榜

            2014年8月21日 #

            @import url(http://www.shnenglu.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Load.ashx?type=style&file=SyntaxHighlighter.css);@import url(/css/cuteeditor.css); 出售如下二手書:@import url(http://www.shnenglu.com/CuteSoft_Client/CuteEditor/Load.ashx?type=style&file=SyntaxHighlighter.css);@import url(/css/cuteeditor.css);
            《一個操作系統的實現》
            《Photoshop設計寶典》
            《OpenGL編程指南》
            《More Effective C++》
            《Linux系統管理手冊》
            《Imperfect C++》
            《GRE詞匯精選》
            《DSP嵌入式系統開發典型案例》
            《深度探索C++對象模型》
            《Advanced C++》


            聯系QQ:121475490
            posted @ 2014-08-21 07:50 Smile 閱讀(308) | 評論 (0)編輯 收藏

            2011年8月11日 #

            原文地址:

            http://tom.preston-werner.com/2010/08/23/readme-driven-development.html


            Readme Driven Development

            23 August 2010 - San Francisco

            I hear a lot of talk these days about TDD and BDD and Extreme Programming and SCRUM and stand up meetings and all kinds of methodologies and techniques for developing better software, but it's all irrelevant unless the software we're building meets the needs of those that are using it. Let me put that another way. A perfect implementation of the wrong specification is worthless. By the same principle a beautifully crafted library with no documentation is also damn near worthless. If your software solves the wrong problem or nobody can figure out how to use it, there's something very bad going on.

            Fine. So how do we solve this problem? It's easier than you think, and it's important enough to warrant its very own paragraph.

            Write your Readme first.

            First. As in, before you write any code or tests or behaviors or stories or ANYTHING. I know, I know, we're programmers, dammit, not tech writers! But that's where you're wrong. Writing a Readme is absolutely essential to writing good software. Until you've written about your software, you have no idea what you'll be coding. Between The Great Backlash Against Waterfall Design and The Supreme Acceptance of Agile Development, something was lost. Don't get me wrong, waterfall design takes things way too far. Huge systems specified in minute detail end up being the WRONG systems specified in minute detail. We were right to strike it down. But what took its place is too far in the other direction. Now we have projects with short, badly written, or entirely missing documentation. Some projects don't even have a Readme!

            This is not acceptable. There must be some middle ground between reams of technical specifications and no specifications at all. And in fact there is. That middle ground is the humble Readme.

            It's important to distinguish Readme Driven Development from Documentation Driven Development. RDD could be considered a subset or limited version of DDD. By restricting your design documentation to a single file that is intended to be read as an introduction to your software, RDD keeps you safe from DDD-turned-waterfall syndrome by punishing you for lengthy or overprecise specification. At the same time, it rewards you for keeping libraries small and modularized. These simple reinforcements go a long way towards driving your project in the right direction without a lot of process to ensure you do the right thing.

            By writing your Readme first you give yourself some pretty significant advantages:

            • Most importantly, you're giving yourself a chance to think through the project without the overhead of having to change code every time you change your mind about how something should be organized or what should be included in the Public API. Remember that feeling when you first started writing automated code tests and realized that you caught all kinds of errors that would have otherwise snuck into your codebase? That's the exact same feeling you'll have if you write the Readme for your project before you write the actual code.

            • As a byproduct of writing a Readme in order to know what you need to implement, you'll have a very nice piece of documentation sitting in front of you. You'll also find that it's much easier to write this document at the beginning of the project when your excitement and motivation are at their highest. Retroactively writing a Readme is an absolute drag, and you're sure to miss all kinds of important details when you do so.

            • If you're working with a team of developers you get even more mileage out of your Readme. If everyone else on the team has access to this information before you've completed the project, then they can confidently start work on other projects that will interface with your code. Without any sort of defined interface, you have to code in serial or face reimplementing large portions of code.

            • It's a lot simpler to have a discussion based on something written down. It's easy to talk endlessly and in circles about a problem if nothing is ever put to text. The simple act of writing down a proposed solution means everyone has a concrete idea that can be argued about and iterated upon.

            Consider the process of writing the Readme for your project as the true act of creation. This is where all your brilliant ideas should be expressed. This document should stand on its own as a testament to your creativity and expressiveness. The Readme should be the single most important document in your codebase; writing it first is the proper thing to do.

            posted @ 2011-08-11 18:20 Smile 閱讀(1492) | 評論 (0)編輯 收藏

            2007年12月10日 #

            ubuntu 7.10下g++的疑問
                裝完ubuntu 7.10后,在它下面寫了一個基本的C++程序,用g++ 4.1編譯后發現了一個令我感到迷惑的地方。如下的程序:
               int main(int argc, char* argv[])
                {
                  std::cout << "hello" << std::endl;
                }
            在g++下沒有報任何錯誤和警告!
            posted @ 2007-12-10 17:30 Smile 閱讀(568) | 評論 (0)編輯 收藏

            国产综合精品久久亚洲| 777午夜精品久久av蜜臀| 伊人久久精品无码二区麻豆| 91久久精品无码一区二区毛片| 欧美噜噜久久久XXX| 亚洲国产精品无码久久SM | 久久97久久97精品免视看| 996久久国产精品线观看| 波多野结衣中文字幕久久| 久久综合九色综合网站| 久久国产精品99国产精| 精品久久久久久国产91| 欧美777精品久久久久网| 伊人色综合久久天天| 久久精品二区| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜2020一| 亚洲国产天堂久久久久久| 人妻无码精品久久亚瑟影视 | 久久无码中文字幕东京热| 久久九九久精品国产免费直播| 精品国产乱码久久久久软件| 久久精品国产亚洲精品2020 | 国内精品免费久久影院| 日韩va亚洲va欧美va久久| 亚洲午夜久久久影院| 国产精品免费福利久久| 久久性生大片免费观看性| 久久99精品久久久大学生| 国产精品久久久久天天影视| 久久久久人妻一区精品果冻| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩蜜臀浪潮| 欧美精品一区二区精品久久| 国产精品久久久久免费a∨| 久久国产精品-国产精品| 一本色综合久久| 99久久国产综合精品五月天喷水| 2021久久精品免费观看| 亚洲国产成人久久综合一 | 国产精品久久亚洲不卡动漫| 热久久国产欧美一区二区精品 | av无码久久久久不卡免费网站|