• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            醬壇子

            專注C++技術(shù) 在這里寫(xiě)下自己的學(xué)習(xí)心得 感悟 和大家討論 共同進(jìn)步(歡迎批評(píng)!!!)

              C++博客 :: 首頁(yè) :: 聯(lián)系 :: 聚合  :: 管理
              66 Posts :: 16 Stories :: 236 Comments :: 0 Trackbacks

            公告

            王一偉 湖南商學(xué)院畢業(yè) 電子信息工程專業(yè)

            常用鏈接

            留言簿(19)

            我參與的團(tuán)隊(duì)

            搜索

            •  

            積分與排名

            • 積分 - 388626
            • 排名 - 64

            最新隨筆

            最新評(píng)論

            閱讀排行榜

            評(píng)論排行榜

            The PIMPL idiom

            In C++ when anything in a header file changes, all code that includes the header (either directly or indirectly) must be recompiled. To minimalize this we use PIMPL idiom:

            // file x.h
            class X
            {
            public:
            // public members
            protected:
            // protected members
            private:
            // pointer to forward declared class
            class XImpl *pimpl_;  // opaque pointer
            };
            

            Questions: -- What should go into XImpl? Options are:

            • Put all private data but not functions into XImpl.: Not too bad, but there is better

            • Put all private members into XImpl.

            • Put all private and protected members into XImpl. Bad, protected members must be in X

            • Make XImpl entirely the class that X would have been, and write X as only the public interface made up entirely of simple forwarding functions (handle/body variant).

            -- Does XImpl require a pointer back to the X object?

            Caveats:

            • You can't hide virtual member functions in the Pimpl (here private inheritance differs from membership)

            • Functions in Pimpl may require a "back pointer" to the visible object (by convention that is called: self_.

            • Often the best compromise is to use Option 2, and in addition to put into XImpl only rhose non-private functions that need to be called by private ones.

            • 4th is better over 2nd not needed "back pointer", but X is useless for inheritance.

            PIPML has some drawbacks, like allocating/deallocating objects in the heap, which could be slow.

            What about this "optimalization"?

            // file: y.h
            class Y
            {
            //...
            static const size_t sizeofx = /* ... */;
            char x_[sizeofx];
            };
            // file: y.cpp
            #include "x.h"
            Y::Y()
            {
            assert( sizeofx >= sizeof(X) );
            new(&x_[0]) X;
            }
            Y::~Y()
            {
            (reinterpret_cast<X*>(&x_[0]))->~X();
            }
            

            Questions:

            • What is the Pimpl space overhead?

            • What is the performance overhead?

            Space overhead:

            #include <iostream>
            using namespace std;
            struct X {
            char c;
            struct XImpl *pimpl_;
            };
            struct XImpl { char c; };
            int main()
            {
            cout << sizeof(XImpl) << '\t' << sizeof(X) << endl;
            return 0;
            }
            // result: 1    8
            

            Runtime overhead:

            • allocation/deallocation cost: relativelly expensive

            • indirect access of private members (+ back pointer)

            • alignment problems: new guaranties, that object will align properly, char[] buffers doesn't!

            • X must not use the default assignmentoperator=()

            • If sizeof(XImpl) grows greater then sizeofx, we need to update the source.

            // file x.h
            class X
            {
            //...
            struct XImpl *pimpl_;
            };
            // file x.cpp
            #include "x.h"
            struct XImpl
            {
            // private stuff here ...
            static void *operator new(size_t)   { /*...*/ }
            static void *operator delete(void*) { /*...*/ }
            };
            X::X() : pimpl_( new XImpl ) { }
            X::~X() { delete pimpl_; pimpl_ = 0; }
            
            posted on 2007-07-16 14:51 @王一偉 閱讀(1316) 評(píng)論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用

            只有注冊(cè)用戶登錄后才能發(fā)表評(píng)論。
            網(wǎng)站導(dǎo)航: 博客園   IT新聞   BlogJava   博問(wèn)   Chat2DB   管理


            亚洲一区二区三区日本久久九| 久久亚洲AV无码精品色午夜| 高清免费久久午夜精品| 久久久久国产一区二区三区| 国产精品免费福利久久| 国产69精品久久久久观看软件| 精品一二三区久久aaa片| 狠狠久久综合伊人不卡| 久久综合久久综合久久| 99精品国产在热久久无毒不卡| 久久青草国产手机看片福利盒子| 久久影视国产亚洲| 精品久久久久久国产三级| 日韩精品久久久久久久电影| 久久AAAA片一区二区| 亚洲综合伊人久久综合| 久久综合久久美利坚合众国| 97久久综合精品久久久综合| 久久免费视频1| 精品人妻伦一二三区久久| 2021精品国产综合久久| 久久精品亚洲AV久久久无码| 久久久受www免费人成| 99久久精品国产一区二区蜜芽| 久久综合久久自在自线精品自| 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院 | 欧美激情一区二区久久久| 99热成人精品免费久久| 久久久久久国产精品无码下载| 国产精品久久一区二区三区| 狠狠干狠狠久久| 日韩中文久久| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久| 一本久久a久久精品亚洲| 99久久国产亚洲综合精品| 久久这里的只有是精品23| 一本久久精品一区二区| 国产精品欧美久久久天天影视 | 大美女久久久久久j久久| 国内精品久久久久久久久| 久久99精品国产99久久6|