• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            huangyi5209

              C++博客 :: 首頁 :: 聯(lián)系 :: 聚合  :: 管理
              0 Posts :: 13 Stories :: 0 Comments :: 0 Trackbacks

            常用鏈接

            留言簿

            我參與的團(tuán)隊

            搜索

            •  

            最新評論

            Pointers and references look different enough (pointers use the “*” and “->” operators, references use “.“), but they seem to do similar things. Both pointers and references let you refer to other objects indirectly. How, then, do you decide when to use one and not the other?

            First, recognize that there is no such thing as a null reference. A reference must always refer to some object. As a result, if you have a variable whose purpose is to refer to another object, but it is possible that there might not be an object to refer to, you should make the variable a pointer, because then you can set it to null. On the other hand, if the variable must alwaysrefer to an object, i.e., if your design does not allow for the possibility that the variable is null, you should probably make the variable a reference.

            “But wait,” you wonder, “what about underhandedness like this?”

            1. char *pc = 0;          // set pointer to null   
            2. char& rc = *pc;        // make reference refer to   
            3.                        // dereferenced null pointer  

            Well, this is evil, pure and simple. The results are undefined (compilers can generate output to do anything they like), and people who write this kind of code should be shunned until they agree to cease and desist. If you have to worry about things like this in your software, you’re probably best off avoiding references entirely. Either that or finding a better class of programmers to work with. We’ll henceforth ignore the possibility that a reference can be “null.”

            Because a reference must refer to an object, C++ requires that references be initialized:

            string& rs;             // error! References must   
            1.                         // be initialized   
            2. string s("xyzzy");   
            3. string& rs = s;         // okay, rs refers to s  

            Pointers are subject to no such restriction:

            1. string *ps;             // uninitialized pointer:   
            2.                         // valid but risky  

            The fact that there is no such thing as a null reference implies that it can be more efficient to use references than to use pointers. That’s because there’s no need to test the validity of a reference before using it:

            void printDouble(const double& rd)   
            1. {   
            2.     cout << rd;         // no need to test rd; it   
            3. }                       // must refer to a double  

            Pointers, on the other hand, should generally be tested against null:

            1. void printDouble(const double *pd)   
            2. {   
            3. if (pd) {             // check for null pointer   
            4. cout << *pd;   
            5. }   
            6. }  

            Another important difference between pointers and references is that pointers may be reassigned to refer to different objects. A reference, however, always refers to the object with which it is initialized:

            1. string s1("Nancy");   
            2. string s2("Clancy");   
            3. string& rs = s1;         // rs refers to s1   
            4.   
            5. string *ps = &s1;        // ps points to s1<A name=31186></A>   
            6.   
            7. rs = s2;                 // rs still refers to s1,   
            8.                          // but s1's value is now   
            9.                          // "Clancy"   
            10.   
            11. ps = &s2;                // ps now points to s2;   
            12.                          // s1 is unchanged  

            In general, you should use a pointer whenever you need to take into account the possibility that there’s nothing to refer to (in which case you can set the pointer to null) or whenever you need to be able to refer to different things at different times (in which case you can change where the pointer points). You should use a reference whenever you know there will always be an object to refer to and you also know that once you’re referring to that object, you’ll never want to refer to anything else.

            References, then, are the feature of choice when you know you have something to refer to, when you’ll never want to refer to anything else, and when implementing operators whose syntactic requirements make the use of pointers undesirable. In all other cases, stick with pointers.

            posted on 2011-01-24 20:29 huangyi5209 閱讀(267) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用 所屬分類: C/C++
            99精品国产在热久久| 久久夜色精品国产www| 久久w5ww成w人免费| 91秦先生久久久久久久| 亚洲va久久久久| 久久r热这里有精品视频| 最新久久免费视频| 久久精品国产一区二区三区日韩| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜2020| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码麻豆| 亚洲国产精品久久久久婷婷软件| 久久亚洲精品无码VA大香大香| 国产精品一区二区久久国产| 久久免费大片| 色偷偷888欧美精品久久久| 99蜜桃臀久久久欧美精品网站| 26uuu久久五月天| 国产精品99精品久久免费| 久久噜噜久久久精品66| 久久99精品国产麻豆不卡| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片| 91精品国产色综久久| 久久精品无码一区二区无码| 伊人久久大香线蕉成人| 久久综合九色综合久99| 久久久不卡国产精品一区二区| 99久久精品免费看国产一区二区三区 | 人妻精品久久无码区| 国产精品久久久久久久人人看| 国产精品VIDEOSSEX久久发布| 久久亚洲AV成人出白浆无码国产 | 久久精品这里只有精99品| 国产精品久久一区二区三区| 久久久久久久亚洲Av无码| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区首JN | 久久伊人色| 亚洲色欲久久久久综合网| 日本国产精品久久| 人人狠狠综合久久亚洲| 2021国产精品午夜久久| 久久亚洲av无码精品浪潮|