我的p听力好差。。。T_T
在refer了一些stallman的其他演讲的transcript之后ȝ大多数内容还是catch了～～～
果然xf教育我们说对内容的预判是王道~~~
q儿有两他曄的lecture
http://www.fsfeurope.org/documents/rms-fs-2006-03-09.en.html
http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3/torino-rms-transcript.en.html
好像stallman特别喜欢拿M$的Y件说事。。。恩Q不q找C虾cgoogle的?br>Google designs software specifically to restrict the user. That's the nature of the Google Earth client: it is made the way it is specifically to restrict the people who use it. Obviously, it's not Free Software, because Free Software develops under the democratic control of its users. With the four freedoms: the freedom to run the program as you wish, to study the source code and change it so the program does what you wish, the freedom to distribute exact copies to others (which is the freedom to help your neighbour) and the freedom to distribute copies of your modified version (which is the freedom to contribute to your community). With these four freedoms the users, individually and collectively, are in charge.
原文q接
http://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/transcript_richard_stallman_honorary_degree_speech_pavia_2007
注明一下，q些内容q不完全代表我的观点。我特别郁闷的是他对QT/KDE的态度。。?br>我个人的观点q在forming,
我不是纯_因为好用或者技术上的领先才ȝGNU/linux的，虽然很多Zh的GNU/linuxQ在自己E微配置了一下以后）(j)巨好用无比?br>我的GNU/linux大致是能用。。。但是M上没有当q的windows 2000好用Q就q么被M$抛弃?..T_TQ?br>单一点说Q在完全不能用的free software?non-free software之间Q我昄选择后者?br>但在现有的GNU/linux distribution和XP/Vista之间Q我昄选择前者?br>另外个h对QT那种非GPL觉得q可以。在GNOME和KDE之间Q选择是后者?br>个h感觉。。?br>free software / GNU Linux
p.s. 听了speech最significant的一Ҏ(gu)知道了应该叫做GNU/Linux
单一点说QGNU是一Ҏ(gu)大的工程Q它也包括了制作一个操作系l，同时包括其他很多软gQGCC,G++,Emacs........
然后呢，GNU操作pȝ的设计很早就完成了。。。然后他们写啊写。。?br>在写了接q十q之后，l于大体完工了，差一个kernel了。。?br>接着呢。。。据说原配写kernel的那个h写囧了。。?br>于是Linusp来帮忙写了个kernel玩，叫做Linux?br>于是大家都只儡看到拼盘的最后一块。。?br>LinuxQ严格意义上来说Q只是GNU System的一Ukernel实现方式而已?br>stallman_(d)(x)
- Why do you call it GNU/Linux and not Linux?
- Most operating system distributions based on Linux as kernel are
basically modified versions of the GNU operating system. We began
developing GNU in 1984, years before Linus Torvalds started to write
his kernel. Our goal was to develop a complete free operating system.
Of course, we did not develop all the parts ourselves—but we led the way.
We developed most of the central components, forming the largest single
contribution to the whole system. The basic vision was ours too.
In fairness, we ought to get at least equal mention.
下面是昨天的演讲?~20分钟内容～～?br>
Hello & Happy Hacking (Laugh, Applause)
Society usually teaches people to judge software packages by practical concerns only
is this program convenient,
is this program reliable,
is it cheap,
and to ignore the most important questions:
if I use this program,
what does it do to my freedom?
if I use this program,
what does it do to the social solidarity of my community?
So people ignore the most important things
Those questions, are what free software is about,
free software, means software that respects users' freedom
it's a matter of freedom, not practice
when you tranlate it to chinese, you should say "自由", but not "免费"
(laugh & applause)
software which is not free software, is user-subjugating software, proprietary software,
it keeps user divided and helpless
divided, because everyone is forbidden to share it with everyone else
and helpless, because the users don't have the source code, so they can't change it,
They can't even verify what it actually doing to them.
However, just saying "I'm in favor of freedom" is too vain, is not specfic
Even Bush says he's in favor of freedom (Laugh)
and Bush can recognize freedom even after he's crashed.
So I need to say sth more specific, more precise.
A program is free software, if it gives the 4 essential freedoms.
freedom 0, is to run the program as you wish
freedom 1, is the freedom to study the source code of the program, and change it, to make it do what you wish.
freedom 2, is the freedom to help your neighbour, that's the freedom to make copies, exact copies, and distribute to others, when you wish.
freedome 3, is the freedom to contribute to your community, that's the freedom to make copies of your modified versions, and distribute them to others when you wish. The freedom to distribute copies, includes the freedom to gives them away, and the freedom to sell them, so that hasn't to be 免费, often it is, but that's not part of the definition, that's because that's just about price and price isn't the issue here, freedom is the issue here.
So if the program gives you all 4 of the essential freedoms, then it's a free software, which means that social system of the distribution and use, is an ethical system
Where we respect freedom, and the social solidairy of our comunity.
but if one of these freedom is missing, or insufficient,
then it's proprietary software, non-free software, user-subjugating software,
because the social system of the distribution and use is unethical,
such software should not exist, developing a free software, is a contribution to society, big or small, depending on the details, but at least it's going in the good direction.
but to develop and distribute proprietary program, it's not a contribution to society,
it's a power gramp() , it's attempting to take power of society,
if the program has any attractive features,
those are bait for a trap, and the trap is that you lose your freedom.
so, the aim of free software movement is, software should be free, users should be free. (Applause)
But why are these 4 freedoms essential,
why divide free software this way? Each freedom has its own reason.
Freedom 2, the freedom to help your neighbour,
the freedom to make exact copies and distribute them,
is essential on fundamental moral grounds.
so that you can live an upright, ethical life as a good memeber of your community.
if you use a program that doesn't give you freedom No.2,
you're in danger of falling into a moral dilemma,
at any moment, whenever your friend says, "that program is nice, could i have a copy?"
at that moment, you will face a choice between 2 evils
1 evil, is to give your friend a copy, and violate the licence of the program,
the other evil, is to refuse your friend a copy, and comply with the licence of the program.
Once in the dilema, you ought to choose the lesser evil,
which is to give your friend the copy, and violates the licence of the program
what makes this evil the lesser evil?
well, if you can't avoid doing some kind of wrong to somebody,
better to do wrong to sb who has done wrong and deserves it.
like the developer of pro,
we can assume that your friend is a good friend, a good member of community,
and normally deserves your co-operation,
of coz, it's a good thing to co-opperate with other people as well.
but this case, the case where the people is a good people of the comunity, is a sharpest case,
the sharpest contrast, because let's contrast this good member of your comunity with the developer of the proprietary program who has deliberately attacked the social solidatry of your comunity, deliberately try to divide you.
clearly the lesser evil is to do wrong to the developer,
however, being the lesser evil doesn't mean it's good
it's never a good thing to make an agreement then to break it.
now, there're some kind of agreements, that are evil in themselves,
and keeping them is worse than breaking them,
and that's an example, but still, breaking is not good
and if you give your friend a copy, what will we have,
he will have an unathorized copy of a proprietary program,
and that's a bad thing, almost as bad as an authorized copy would be.
So what you should really do, when you have thought about this ethical issue,
is to make sure, you're never in this dilemma,
there're 2 ways to do that,
1 is, don't have any friends,
the distributers of proprietary software implicitly suggest that method
the other method is , don't use the proprietary software,
if you don't have a copy, you don't have to worry about what you will say to your friend,
that's my method, if sb offers me a proprietary program on the condition that i promise not to share with you,
i would tell them no,
i would say, my conscience doesn't allow me, to make an agreement like that,
a couple of weeks ago, sb give me a computer,
i went to visit the company, and i was given 1 of their computers
and when i try to use it,
the top of screen asking me to accept a licence,
for some non-free programs,
i couldn't agree with that,
so i explain this problem, and i ask if there's anyway i can delete these non-free programs, and go past that and skip around that licence page,
and so far, it's not clear that i can do so, so i may never actually use that computer,
coz i'm not going to accept that licence.
and we must reject the probability against the terms,
that our enermy's use,
for instance, what's it mean, when they say, if you share you're pirate,
what they really tring to say?
they're trying to say, that helping your neighbour,
is the moral eqivalent of attacking a ship, to stealing a cargo,
and nothing could be more false than that,
because attacking a ship is very very bad,
but helping your neighbour is the right thing to do,
so those people are trying to twist up our ideas of right and wrong,
by using dishonest words,
we have watched out their dishonest words and rejects them,
so when sb asks me what do i think of piracy,
i say that attacking ships is very bad,
and if someone asks me what i think of software piracy,
i say as far as i know, pricay these days use guns, but not software.
well that's the reason for freedom 2, the freedom to help your neighbour, the freedom to make exact copies and distribute them to others when you wish
Freedom 0, the freedom to run the program as you wish,
is essential for different reason,
so you could control your computing.
There're proprietary programs whose licence restricted even the use of authorized copies,
and that's obviously not controlling your computing,
so that's unacceptable,
we have to reject programs whose licences restricted how you can run them, or for what purpose, or how long, or anything like that.
because you, have to be in control your own computing.
but, freedom 0 is not enough.
because, the developer still controls what you do,
not through the licence, but through the code, the program.
so we also need freedom 1, the freedom to study the source code and to change it.
so the program does what you wish,
this way, you decide, instead of having the developers decided and imposed decisions on you.
if a program doesn't come with freedom 1,
you can even tell what's it doing to you.
and many of these programs do nasty things,
they have features designed to spy on the user, to restrict the user, even to attack the user,
of coz, spying on the user and restricting the user is not done only by software and your computer,
and it's also done by servers and gateways,
but that's the different issue,
if you can't even control your computing on your computer,
you're totally under the power of the software developers,
and there malicious features are quite common,
for instance, many proprietary program spy on the user,
1 you may heard of, that spy on user is called MS windows.
when the users of windows, and i won't say you, because i'm sure you won't use nasty program like this.
when the users of windows, clicks on the menu feature, to search his own files for a word,
windows sends a message to MS saying what word you're searching for.
that's 1 spy feature.
but there's another, when XP asks for an upgrade,
it sends MS a message of a list of all the programs on the machine,
that's another spy feature,
but are those the only ones?
we don't know, MS never announced these spy features,
people find them by investigation,
so there could be more spy features, that people haven't found yet,
however, windows isn't the only program that spy on the user,
WMP does too, in fact, it does total surveillance. it report everything that the user looks at.
that illustrates today, cooperations try to spy on people just as same as the government do,
most of the world is now under an empire of the magical coperations(???)
and most governor do whatever the magical coperations(??) tells them to do,
and this means they're not democratic, and that's bad thing.
So, WMP spys on users, but, please don't think MS is uniquely evil, that MS
is the only company so nasty that will do this
because RealPlayer does the same thing,
and we're almost certain RealPlayer did it first,
after all, MS is more known for imitation than invetion.
But malicious feature gets worse than just spying,
there's also the malicious feature, functionality of refusing to function.
when the program says, i don't wanna show the contents of this file,
even though it's in your own computer,
i don't wanna let you copy part of this file
even though it's in your own computer,
i'm not going to print this file for you, coz i don't like you.
and i wasn't put here to serve you, i was put here to control you.
i'm not your servant, although i pretend to be,
i'm actually your prison guard.
now this practice is also know as DRM(Digital Restrictions Management),
intentionally implemented malicious feature of stopping you from doing things, that sb else doesn't want you to do.
and many companies do this, for instance MS, apple, google, adobe, sony, amazon does this, and many other.
and everytime they do this,
it attacks your freedom, at 2 different levels at once.
first of all, the purpose of these restrictions, is to attack your freedom,
it's to stop you from doing things which would otherwise be your legal right,
but the way they do it attacks your freedom at another level,
because they do it by publishing things in secret formats,
and that is to make sure we can't write any free software to access those things,
so even to access them in a way permitted, you have to use a non-free program,
and that's also an attack on your freedom,
2 attacks on your freedom at the same time,
because that's so dangerous,
we urge you never to buy or accept or use any product with DRM,
unless you personally possess the means to break the DRM.
so far instances, if you have the free software that can read and play a DVD
then it's OK to buy or rent DVDs or accept as gifts,
but if you don't have that free software,
you should refuse to accept a DVD,
there're a few DVDs which are not encrypted
and they don't post a problem, they don't have the DRM, that's fine, i have a few of those,
i don't have any encrypted DVDs, i reject them.
]]>
]]>
p.s. performance comparison
freepeter@localhost ~ $ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 1392 MB in 2.00 seconds = 695.92 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 8 MB in 3.54 seconds = 2.26 MB/sec
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
freepeter@localhost ~ $ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1706 MB in 2.00 seconds = 852.66 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 94 MB in 3.04 seconds = 30.93 MB/sec
另外UDMA也打开了。。。生zȝ好～～?br>
p.s.
/dev/sdX device files are for SCSI, SATA disks.
/dev/hdX device files are for IDE hard disks.
]]>
其实最q对很多|上的一?#8220;Linux比Windows?#8220;的文章相当之不满。。。本来正在打写文章批的。。。不q看到这。。。恩。。。写的很不错啊～～～我就不用写了。。?br>个h比较喜欢GPL的那U自q_。。。虽然这个导致了本来好好的KDE之后又有一帮h跑去开发GnomeQgtk写的直不是给人看的——毛大牛语）(j)Q严重分散了_֊是吧Q否则估计都该KDE 5了。。?br>Linux本n只是一个academical的试验操作系l。。。能拿来当操作系l完全依赖于发行版这一模式。。?br>
以下为原?/span>
1. 不要?#8220;传教?#8221;
很多人在讨论Z断的引v "Linux vs. Windows" 之类的讨论，甚至争的面红而Q这是没有必要的? q种争论是浪Ҏ(gu)间而没有Q何用处的。对Q你׃一下午Q用许多事实“捍卫”?“Linux ?Windows ?#8221; q个说法。但? Windows 的支持者ƈ不会(x)喜欢?LinuxQ他们只是稍微退~一下，然后找一些新的证据来跟你辩论?世界上的Z都在利用Linux 研究最前沿的科学，我们q在q里讨论 “要不要用Linux” q种无聊的问题，什么时候才能赶上时代前q的步伐Q?什么叫?#8220;Windows 支持?#8221;Q什么叫?#8220;Linux 支持?#8221;Q我们ؓ(f)什么要支持某一个而反对另外一个？你不需要ؓ(f) Linux “护法”Q不需要成?#8220;Linux 支持?#8221;或?#8220;GNU传教?#8221;QGNU/Linux 已经用事实向世界证明了它们的威力Q已l被大多Ch接受。你只需要安安静静n? GNU/Linux l你的乐和自由?你需要关心的不是你的工具是什么，而是你用它做了什么。精?Linux q不说明M问题Q因为它只是一个工兯(g)已。如果你?Windows 能很好的完成你的dQ那你就没有必要Ҏ(gu)间去熟?zhn)? Linux。直到有一天你发现一Q务只?Linux 才能完成的时候再换也不迟Q因Zw边?Linux 的爱好者一定会(x)很乐意的帮助你?br>
工具不是人，不应该对工具有感情。这是你在进行Q何对工具的讨论前需要提醒自q事情。面对一些容易引起争论的东西QWord ? TeXQEmacs ?VIMQMAXIMAQMathematica ?MapleQGnomeQ?FVWM ?KDEQMutt ? Pine …… 一定要冷静的对自己_(d)(x)“我不站在它们M一边，因ؓ(f)它们不是人?#8221; 各h的需要不同，生活的环境不同。对你来说好的东西，对别人来说不一定好Q我们需要尊重别人的选择。如果你当面说别人正在用的程序不好，没有Z(x)乐意接受 你的意见。我从来没有q我爸爸不用 Windows + WPSQ而用 Linux + LaTeX 来处理他的英语试南因?WPS 是我爸爸的选择Q他能用 WPS ~辑出很好的试题L试他的学生，那就_了?br>
我曾l帮我爸爸做了一?perl E序Q能够自动从一U我自己设计?markup 语言转化?LaTeX 格式的英语试南可以自动对试题~号Qؕ序排版选择题的选项Q自动生成答案表Q生成老师用的昄{案的版本，自动对短文改错题q行优化分段Q自动拼写检 查，囑Ş化的配置方式…… 我爸爔R兴的用了一D|_(d)可是后来他想?WPS 里的一U标题样式，而我不在Ӟ无法Z修改E序。所以他又换回了 WPS。这像有h送爱因斯坦一|剃L沫一P刚开始几天，发现他神采飞扬，不断夸这个东西真舒服。过了几天，发现爱因斯坦又开始用白水剃胡子了Q因? 剃须泡沫用完了，他懒得自己去买那个东ѝ这只是?fn)惯问题?
2. 不要自己
喜欢?sh)脑的hL有某些心理强q們。有的h_(d)(x)“键盘比鼠标快。我不要用鼠标。这h有高效率?#8221; 所以他在编辑器里无Z么时候L?20w, 10j q样的命令到辄的点。他甚至觉得囑Ş界面是多余的Q干?Xwindow 都不装? 全部用键盘看h的确比让手离开键盘L鼠标Q再回来“?#8221; 多了Q但是快的击键频率不{于工作的高效率Q对你的健康更没有什么好处。这只能把你变成打键盘的机器? 当你正在(g)查你的文章或者程序，思维正在随着字符的含义流动，H然 20w, 10j q样的东西出现在你的脑子里，是不是会(x)打断思\Q不Q那说明你当时思考的问题比较单，q些q扰q不?x)v到副作用?br>
其实很多人用?sh)脑的时候，思想都受到某U教条的束缚(x)Q上面这个只是众多教条中的一U。某些h刉了很多q种教条Q用他的工作方式来要求别人，嘲笑方式? 他不一L(fng)人。比如有的h嘲笑其它人写 C E序不按 8 字符~进Q嘲W别人在 vi 里用方向键，嘲笑别h不知?PVM 是什么，嘲笑其它人用 JAVA, C# q种?GC 回收内存语言…… 你不用管各种各样的教条，?sh)脑只是你的奴隶Q你x么用就怎么用。没有h能够U束你，没有人可以嘲W你的工作方式。电(sh)脑明天就不再是这个样子，所以今天你 不用完全了解它。你没有必要知道别h创造的一切，因ؓ(f)你需要留Ҏ(gu)间自己创造些东西。Just have fun! 当你下次修改文章的时候，不妨试试(zhn)闲的用鼠标在你眼睛看到的地方轻ȝ一下?
3. 不要“?Linux”
很多人用 Linux 的时候会(x)感觉很迷茫，该用哪个发行呢？是不是我装了什么？怎么升q么快啊Q怎么q么不稳定！每当遇到新的软g他就惌用，每当新的版本出现Q他更 斎ͼ然后用鼠标在新的菜单里选择从来没见q的E序来用用?其实你是ZLinux而用LinuxQ而没有找到正的理由来利? Linux。你首先要明用?sh)脑的目的，你用它是Z解决你的实际问题Q而不是ؓ(f)了学?fn)安装操作系l，不是Z试哪个版本好用Q不是ؓ(f)?#8220;赶上潮流”Q? 更不是因Z盘太大了，你想多占点空间?如果你启动了?sh)脑之后不知道应该干什么，那么最好先不要用电(sh)脑，因ؓ(f)你可能有更重要的事情需要做?
4. 不用挑剔发行版本
很多人刚开始用 Linux 的时候，L在怀疑别的发行版本是否比自己正在用的q个好，L怀疑自׃后时候会(x)失去支持Q不得不换用别的发行。所以很多h今天? RedhatQ明天又换成?debian, 一?x)儿又?gentoo, …… 甚至有的人在一台机器上装了两个版本? LinuxQ然后比较哪一个好?其实你完全没有必要这样做QQ何发行，只要你熟(zhn)了Q你在上面的工作方式几乎是不?x)受CQ何媄(jing)响的?br>
我以前一直用?RedhatQ当我有一天在我的一台新机器上安?debian Ӟ我发C?Redhat 的经验完全没有浪贏V我用了一个下午就配置好了 debianQ它服服脓(chung)贴的听我的话Q就跟没有换发行一栗?Debian, TurboLinux, SuSE, Redhat, Gentoo, ... M一个版本都是不错的。很多h认ؓ(f)自己攒一?LFS 是高水^黑客的象征，但是不是每个人都有精力去了解所有细节?如果你是用于个h的日怺物和U研Q可以试? debian。它是我见过的最方便的一个发行?
5. 不要盲目升
不知道这是心理作用还是什么，有的人看到比较大的版本号Q就?x)很x成那个。很多h?Redhat 本来配置的很舒服了，可是一?Redhat 发行新的版本Q他们就?x)尽快下载过来，然后选择升安装。结果很多时候把自己原来修改得很好的配置文gl冲掉了。新的Y件又带来了新的问题，比如有一ơ我 ?rxvt 升?2.7.8 p miniChinput 冲突了，升?Redhat 8.0Q发?xmms 居然~省不能放mp3了，XFree86 ?xtt 模块?I810 上有新的 bugQ会(x)D Mozilla H然退出? 如果你已l配|好了一切，千万别再整体升了，q会(x)费你很多很多时间的Q不值得。有句话说得?"If it's not broken, don't fix it." 如果你的E序能够完成你需要做的事情，你何必升U呢Q?
6. 不要配置你不需要的东西
如果你只惛_一个像我这L(fng)普通用P主要目的是用 Linux 来完成自qU研d和日常工作，那就可以不用pȝ理员或者网l管理员的标准来要求自己Q因为当一个系l和|络理员确实很辛苦。普通用户学?fn)那些不l? 常用到的复杂的维护系l的工具Q其实是费旉Q学了不用是?x)很快忘记的Q? 我不是一个合格的|络理员，我的服务器都只设|了我自己需要的功能Q设|好 ssh, ftp 已经_了，那样可以省去我很多麻?ch)。我从来不过度考虑“安全”Q因?Linux ~省已经很安全了。我没有带机，׃用管 tar 的那些稀奇古怪的参数了，czf, xzf, ztf 已经可以满我所有的需要。sed, awk, ... 我也只会(x)几种常用的命令行?
7. 不要?fn)惯的?root 帐号?/span>
在需要的时候才 suQ?q是很多刚接?UNIX cL作系l的人常见的现象Q他们不喜欢在管理系l的时候才 su, 而是一直用 root 帐号q所有事情，配置pȝQ安装程序，览|页Q玩游戏Q编E?…… l果有一天，他不心在某个系l目录用了 rm * ... 后果不堪设想……
8. 不要用商业的眼光来看 Linux?/span>
Linux 不是商业软gQ所以不要用要求 Solaris, Windows 那样的眼光来?Linux. 自由软g的作者们从来不拉拢用P他们对用户不负有M责Q。实际上在自pY件的世界里，“开发?#8221;?#8220;用户” q没有明的界限Q大家是朋友? 自由软g很可能只是满作者和他的朋友的需要，甚至是ؓ(f)了好玩而创造的。自pY件不是完的Q自pY件承认自己有~点Q它不会(x)自吹自擂Q蒙?#8220;用户”的? 目。这U对作者责ȝ解脱Ȁ发了作者的创造力Q他们不用过分考虑“向上兼容”Q他们往往比背上重重包q商业软gl构更合理，技术更先进? 所以当你用某个自由软g遇到困难的时候，不应该埋怨Y件的作者，因ؓ(f)他们对你q没有义务?br>
你不应该把自己当成一个挑剔的֮Q而要把自׃个Y件的N和一个和蔼的者，q样你才能理解作者写q个E序时的快乐Q在遇到问题时向作者反映， 帮助他完善这个YӞ成ؓ(f)一个快乐的参与者。就像你的哥哥送你一个他用旧了的自行车，你应该珍惜这份友情，而不要在车坏了，或者骑车摔了一交的时候大骂你 的哥哥。如果你真的不能使用q种合作的心态，那么最好不要用这个Y件? q是一U先q的文化Q它包含了互相合作，U学创新的精。理解这一点不是很Ҏ(gu)Q很多h往往是因Z能理解这U文化而离开自由软g。这对于作者来说ƈ没有 什么损失?
9. q你的正事去
很多我说Q你的网|Ҏ(gu)好多旉来配|这配置那，一?x)儿?FVWMQ一?x)儿?Mutt …… ?#8230;…那些东西都是我有I的时候一点一点积累的Q如果你想一ơ性搞定所有那些东西，恐怕得׃几个星期甚至几个月的旉Qƈ不是一定要搞定所有这些东西你 才能正常工作的。除非你真的非得利用某个E序Q或者你闲着没事Q否则你可以不管q些东西?
10. 上面几条仅供参?以上只是个h意见Q不一定适合所有h。取舍由你了Q?/span>
]]>
and Under GPL~~~~~~~~~
http://gollum.easycp.de/en/
]]>
If you get the following:
ipw2200: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection
ipw2200: ipw2200-bss.fw request_firmware failed: Reason -2
ipw2200: Unable to load firmware: -2
ipw2200: failed to register network device
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:03:03.0 disabled
ipw2200: probe of 0000:03:03.0 failed with error -5
In the latest distribution of Gentoo(kernel>=2.6.23-r3, and udev>=115-r1), everything configuration files are OK now. You may find
SUBSYSTEM=="firmware", ACTION=="add", RUN+="firmware.sh
in the file/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules. Even list ipw2200 in /etc/modules.autoload/kernel-2.6 is unnecessary now.
However, if you compiled the driver into the kernel, you may suffer this problem. One way to solve it is to regenerate the kernel and compile the driver as a module.
Also you may apply this patch : http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/patches/ipw2200-1.2.2-close_intf.patch
For more informations, visit : http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202557
If it's not because of this, or you use a relatively old version of kernel, you may read the solutions below.
The reason is very simple (From bugzilla id 202557)
When the ipw2200 driver is built into the kernel (not as a module), it attempts to load firmware from a file on disk while the kernel is initializing, which of course fails because there is no filesystem at this point in time.
The whole article can be found in http://gentoo-wiki.com/HARDWARE_ipw2200
]]>
话说那天先用gentoo的live-cd启动Q然后试囄接用安装脚本?br> 然后L在第一步uncompress stage3的时候出错。。。而且每次都是Wstep 97...-_-bbbb
错误信息参见 出错信息
原因不太清楚。。。似乎是在copy一些文件的时候他试图讉K/删除光盘上的东东Q难道是我机器的挂蝲Ҏ(gu)较神奇？。。?br> 然后怒了。。。决定根?Gentoo Guide 上的文档手动一步一步配|?br>
文档上写的还是挺详细的，一些tips:
1. 如果有live-cd的话stage3和portage׃用现下了?br> 2. 其实可以不急着emerge --sync。。。晚些时候再说。。?br> 3. 一开始徏议还是老老实实的genkernel吧。。。我一开始手动配|内核然后编译出来的直接启动不了。。?_-bbbbbbbb
4. 偶的make.conf:
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium-m -pipe" # 不开O3对不起h民～～～
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" # q个ms是给link的参敎ͼ
MAKEOPTS="-j2" # 双线E，据说U程的个数是CPU个数 + 1 ~ CPU个数 * 2
FEATURES="ccache parallel-fetch" # 打开一边编译一边下载的功能
5. 关于emerge的代理。。?br> 也是在make.conf里改
http_proxy=xxoo
RSYNC_PROXY=xxoo
然后配好grub, 重新启动。。?br> 怎么都启动不了。。。说什么root分区/dev/sda2/无法被挂载。。?br> 最后发现要Ҏ(gu)/dev/hda2/...@@@@Q?br> q个很奇怪，live-cd启动的时候偶的硬盘就是被认成/dev/sda2的。。。ؓ(f)什么装好的pȝ被认?dev/hda2呢。。?br>
接下来是一个标准的裸系l。。。要sudo没sudo, 要vim没vim...-_-bbbbbbb
开始疯狂的emerge动作。。。从vim, sudo 到X, KDE(偶装的是kdebase-meta,相当_的KDE哈～～～)
记得没装gnome的h~译gvim的时候USE FLAG加上gtk。。。否则编译出来一塌糊涂啊。。?br>
然后是中文支持的问题。。。参?a >官方wiki关于scim的文?/a>
另外 q篇文章 q不错?br> 目前的主要问题是如果我在/etc/env.d/100i18n中不指定LC_ALLQ那么他?x)提C我说LC_ALL = default locale不存在。?_-bbbbbbbb
而且现在locale都换成中文了...E序界面都是中文?..不爽...
现在的问题是...~译了一个audacious...除了放不出声音以外别的都挺好...
有的忙了~~~
]]>